The Integration of Google Docs in Enhancing Students’ English Writing Performance

The Integration of Google Docs in Enhancing Students’ English Writing Performance

 

Faza Afifah Ghina Putri Abdilah

fazafagpa@students.unnes.ac.id

English Education Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Art

Universitas Negeri Semarang

 

       I.            Introduction

Developed by Google, Google Docs is a web-based word processing program now among the most helpful educational information and communication technology (ICT) solutions available. This program lets users produce, revise, and distribute documents online using several cooperative features that significantly assist learning. On computers, laptops, tablets, and smartphones among others, Google Docs may be used to let the users work flexibly whenever and wherever they are online. One of ICT's tools, Google Docs enables simple handling of shared documents by letting several individuals simultaneously edit the same document, make comments, recommend changes, and automatically preserve a history of modifications. Particularly for enhancing their writing abilities, Google Docs becomes a really interesting and practical tool to enable students to learn English (Fan, 2017).

Among the most crucial and difficult abilities for kids in all levels of education is English writing. Apart from grammar and vocabulary, writing skills ask students to be able to arrange ideas logically, present arguments succinctly, and edit writing to be better. Many students struggle to improve their English writing ability, though. A lack of confidence, a small vocabulary, difficulty arranging ideas, and absence of helpful teacher input frequently cause these problems. Moreover, aggravating this situation are conventional teaching techniques highlighting the ultimate written work without giving students chances for ongoing edits. This makes students lose motivation, become disappointed, and reduce their interest in English writing according to Zhou et al.

In the world of learning to write, digital tools are like a magical surprise that can solve all the problems. Useful web apps like Google Docs allow students to work together to write, send ideas to each other, and improve their writing instantly. So, writing is no longer solitary and mundane, but something lively and exciting. The comment and suggestion feature in Google Docs allows teachers and friends to give feedback directly on certain parts of the writing, so that students can quickly see the mistakes and correct them. In addition, Google Docs also has an automatic grammar and spelling check tool that really helps students recognize mistakes and learn to correct them themselves. This is very important to make students confident when writing, because they can learn from mistakes without waiting for the teacher to tell them (Jeong, 2016).

Moreover, the cooperative features of Google Docs help to enable cooperative writing learning methods, which have been shown to be successful in raising students' writing abilities. Students in cooperative learning not just write independently but also debate, share ideas, and edit their work collaboratively. Not only does this method help students acquire social and communication abilities but it also raises the standard of writing. A collaborative writing learning approach using Google Docs improved students' learning outcomes and motivation, according to (Andrade & Roshay, n.d.). Furthermore, (Rifai et al., n.d.) found in a quasi-experimental study that utilizing Google Docs in a cooperative writing strategy greatly enhanced student writing capacity in contrast with traditional learning approaches.

Apart from the technical and pedagogical components, Google Docs improved students' interest and motivation in writing. Many students find more excitement and drive from the opportunity to compose cooperatively and interactively with their peers. The features for comments and chat found in Google Docs enable students to communicate more smoothly and quickly, therefore enhancing their learning experience more meaningful and enjoyable. According to (Rifai et al., n.d.), students who used Google Docs in their writing sessions found it simpler to work together and get feedback, therefore boosting their interest in English writing. Therefore, Google Docs serves also as a learning medium that can raise student interest and enthusiasm, not only as a writing tool.

Despite the huge potential of Google Docs, its implementation in English writing learning in Indonesia still faces various challenges. Some teachers and students may not be accustomed to using digital technology optimally in learning. In addition, constraints on internet access and adequate devices are still an obstacle in some areas. The change in learning paradigm from conventional methods to technology-based learning also requires adaptation and training for teachers and students in order to utilize Google Docs features optimally. Therefore, in-depth research on how Google Docs can be effectively integrated in writing learning is needed to identify supporting and inhibiting factors, as well as appropriate strategies to overcome these challenges (Ebrahimi, 2024).

Although Google Docs has enormous potential, its application in Indonesian English writing education yet presents several obstacles. Some teachers and students could not be used to maximizing digital tools in their education. Furthermore, challenging in some places are limits on internet access and sufficient equipment. The shift in learning strategy from traditional approaches to technology-based learning calls for teacher and student adjustment and training so that Google Docs functions at its greatest. As such, to find supporting and preventing elements as well as suitable techniques to overcome these problems, thorough investigation on how Google Docs may be properly integrated in writing education is necessary (Fan, 2017).

This research will use this description to investigate how integrating Google Docs might improve students' interest in writing as well as their English writing abilities. This study will address two major questions in particular: (1) Does Google Docs help students enhance their English writing abilities? (2) Can using Google Docs help students become more enthusiastic and motivated about their English writing performance? This study will use a case study approach to thoroughly examine the challenges faced by teachers and students during the implementation of Google Docs, as well as effective methods for maximizing the use of this platform in writing instruction.

The potential contribution of this study is anticipated to be twofold: theoretical and practical. This study will enhance the literature on technology-based writing learning, particularly the use of Google Docs as a successful platform for collaborative learning, from a theoretical standpoint. The results of this study, from a practical perspective, can be used by teachers and educators to develop creative, engaging, and learner centerer writing learning approaches. Furthermore, this study is anticipated to offer recommendations for educational policymakers to promote the integration of technology into English language learning in order to raise the quality of instruction and better equip students for the difficulties of the 21st century.

Thus, the integration of Google Docs in English writing learning is not just a mere utilisation of digital technology, but a strategic effort to create a collaborative, reflective, and 21st century skills development-oriented learning environment. Through this research, it is expected to find an effective implementation model, supporting and inhibiting factors that need to be considered, as well as strategic recommendations that can improve the quality of writing learning in schools and universities.

 

    II.            Literature Review

2.1. Language Learning Enhanced by Technology

Dramatic changes have occurred in the educational scene with the extensive use of digital tools in language learning settings. Technology-Enhanced Language Learning changes how students engage with language material and with one other more so than just adding digital instruments to conventional classrooms. Recent developments in this field reveal that effective technology integration calls for thorough consideration of pedagogical ideas rather than just implementing new tools. Modern research shows that technology's part in language acquisition goes beyond simple content distribution to provide realistic communication possibilities. Students now communicate with language through systems that reflect real-world digital communication contexts, hence making their learning experiences more pertinent and transferable. In technology-enhanced environments where students assume more responsibility for their learning activities, the move from teacher centered to student centered learning environments has been especially noticeable. Typically, one of the most difficult facets of second language acquisition, writing abilities have shown particularly successful development with digital platforms. Unlike conventional writing instruction that frequently isolates students during the writing process, technology-enhanced approaches enable ongoing communication and teamwork. This change solves long-standing problems in writing instruction, where students formerly had few chances for true audience involvement and significant revision strategies.

2.2. Approach for Collaborative Writing

From personal, product centered approaches to more cooperative, process-oriented techniques, writing instruction has changed greatly. Modern cooperative writing methods understand that meaning is created via social interaction and that students gain from exposure to many viewpoints and writing techniques. In second language settings especially, where peer contact offers more language input and chances for negotiation of meaning, this approach has especially traction. Studies show that group writing settings motivate students to clearly express their thought processes, justify their linguistic choices, and investigate other ways of expression. As students engage in significant negotiations about language usage, these interactions naturally result in greater lexical complexity and better grammatical accuracy. Additionally helps lower the worry usually linked to second language writing assignments is the social aspect of cooperative writing. Students writing cooperatively become more metacognitive about their writing methods. They start to see patterns in their error types, get more aware of their revision techniques, and create ordered editing and proofreading systems. This metacognitive development is especially important for transfers to independent writing situations where students must rely on inner techniques instead of peer assistance. The motivational advantages of group writing should not be disregarded. Students claim they become more interested when writing transforms from a solitary effort to a social one. The chance to support common goals and get instant peer input fosters a learning environment that promotes risk taking and language experimentation.

2.3. Google Docs as Learning Tools

With its accessibility and complete toolset, Google Docs has become a popular platform for using cooperative writing techniques. The cloud-based character of the platform removes several technical obstacles that previously hampered cooperative writing execution, hence enabling students to collaborate irrespective of their preferred devices or geographical location. This accessibility has been especially helpful in different educational situations when students may have different degrees of technological resources. The real-time editing features of Google Docs open possibilities for synchronous cooperation that were previously unheard of in conventional writing education. As their colleagues' writing processes evolve, students can see their methods for organizing ideas, building arguments, and editing material. This offers insights on several approaches. This honesty in the writing process has a significant educational purpose since students learn from seeing the whole composition process as well as from final results. Google Docs' comment and recommendation tools enable aimed feedback exchanges between students and teachers. Instead of getting broad comments on completed drafts, students can have pointed conversations about particular textual aspects, which will inspire more significant revision efforts. Students can also follow their development and go back to comments throughout time using the permanent record of these interactions. Unique opportunities for thinking about the writing process are provided by version history features. Students can investigate how their texts changed across several iterations, spot trends in their revision approaches, and pinpoint locations in which they often stumble or flourish. This reflective ability helps the development of self-regulation capabilities needed for autonomous writing success.

2.4. Writing performance results

Studies of Google Docs adoption in writing education regularly show increases in several areas of writing quality. Students show increased grammatical accuracy mostly as a result of the peer review procedures made possible by the platform's cooperative capabilities. Peer feedback's ready availability promotes more regular revision cycles, therefore resulting in more polished final products. In several situations where Google Docs enabled group writing projects, lexical diversity improvements have been recorded. Naturally, students who are exposed to their peers' vocabulary choices grow their own lexical repertoires by including new words and more sophisticated word choices into their writing. Natural vocabulary development happens via group conversation rather than through formal teaching. Another field where Google Docs deployment shows favourable results is organizational clarity. While group input gives various angles on logical flow and argument construction, the platform's design and layout elements enable students to organize their thoughts more methodically. When writing turns into a social event with actual readers, students learn to more attentively consider their needs. When students work on cooperative research and writing projects using Google Docs, content development especially improves. The shared workspace enables collective brainstorming, resource exchange, and concept growth that enhances the ultimate written results. Exposure to many knowledge bases and points of view helps students since they might not have independently gained access to them.

2.5. Motivational and Involvement Factors

Google Docs based writing projects' social aspect tackles motivational obstacles often experienced in conventional writing instruction. Students claim greater pleasure when writing turns into a group project, as the interactive features help to keep attention throughout lengthy writing assignments. Regular reinforcement and advice given by the platform's immediate feedback support sustained motivation. Participating in cooperative writing projects improves agency and sense of ownership. Rather than doing homework only for teachers’ assessment, students create for real audiences including their peers and colleagues. This change in audience awareness causes clearer focus on clarity, persuasion, and reader interaction. By normalizing the iterative character of good writing, the transparency of cooperative writing methods lowers performance anxiety. Effective authors revise extensively and get feedback, which helps students to lower their need to produce perfect first drafts. This knowledge helps to shape more realistic expectations for the writing process. Additional incentive comes from the growth of digital literacy as students understand the significance of abilities acquired via Google Docs use to their future professional and academic life. Through digital collaboration tools now more and more prevalent in corporate settings, the platform offers genuine practice.

2.6. Challenges in Implementation

Though there are recorded advantages, Google Docs implementation presents several logistical difficulties teachers have to handle. Many educational settings continue to struggle with constraints on technical infrastructure; erratic internet connectivity or poor gadget access can hamper cooperative writing tasks. Particularly severe are these difficulties in resource-scarce areas where equal access cannot be assured. Another major problem are pedagogical adaptation needs. Many teachers may struggle to create good exercises that make the most of Google Docs' collaborative capability since they have little knowledge of collaborative writing methodologies. Traditional assessment methods may also have to be changed to fit group writing projects and processes. Student opposition to group efforts may first slow implementation success. Some students would rather write separately and could be hesitant to share their developing projects with others. Implementing also calls for great consideration of issues of academic honesty and unequal contribution rates. When introducing any technology-enhanced learning technique, digital distraction is a persistent worry. The same connectivity that facilitates cooperation also offers non-academic material that may compete for students' attention during writing assignments.

 

 III.            Discussion

Google Docs' inclusion in English writing courses has shown rather good results on student writing quality across a range of research scenarios. EFL students who participated in collaborative writing activities with Google Docs showed significant gains in writing quality over their peers employing conventional methods, according to (Alsubaie & Ashuraidah, 2017). With effect sizes indicating significant practical relevance, their research showed notable improvements in content creation, arrangement, and language usage. These results agree with those found by (Afdaliah & Marliana, 2019) who noted that university students engaged in out-of-class group writing exercises through the portal showed better writing ability.   The cooperative aspects of Google Docs seem to promote peer learning activities that straight help to improve writing ability. (Suwantarathip & Wichadee, n.d.) showed that students getting comments via Google Docs' commenting system showed more improvement in writing quality than those getting conventional written feedback. The contextualized character of digital comments, which enabled more precise and immediate feedback on specific aspects of student writing, helped the researchers to explain this increase. This result implies that the interactive capabilities of the platform open up chances for significant peer communication that would be challenging to duplicate in conventional classroom contexts.   Another major area where Google Docs deployment reveals good results is motivational advantages. (Bui, 2023) noted that students involved in writing assignments based on Google Docs showed more interest in and engagement with writing tasks. Their qualitative study showed that students especially appreciated the chance to observe their classmates' writing processes in real-time and to get prompt feedback on their work. Collaborative writing via Google Docs seemed to lessen the solitude sometimes felt with conventional writing assignments, therefore producing a more friendly and participatory learning atmosphere. Google Docs' real-time cooperative features have changed revision techniques in ways that help student learning. Using Google Docs, university students engaged in more frequent and thorough revisions than they did with conventional writing techniques, according to (Fan, 2017a) The openness of the platform's editing process let students observe several techniques of organizing ideas, crafting arguments, and improving vocabulary use. Direct lessons were supplemented by observational learning that offered models of good writing techniques students could use for their own use. Studies have also showed how well the platform helps writing abilities and digital literacy. (Jeong, 2016) found that teachers using Google Docs in their writing lessons saw students organically acquire collaborative digital communication abilities beyond the immediate classroom environment. These abilities helped students with their wider scholastic activities and fit the objectives for 21st-century skill growth stressed in current education policy. In a variety of research situations, implementation obstacles have, however, frequently come forth. (Andrade & Roshay, n.d.) found several impediments to effective collaborative writing adoption, including student opposition to sharing work in progress, questions about unequal participation, and difficulties managing group dynamics in online settings. To surmount these obstacles, their research underlined the need of explicit instruction in group approaches as well as precise expectations for peer interaction. Particularly in resource-poor educational situations, technical infrastructure constraints constantly hamper successful Google Docs implementation. (Ebrahimi, 2024) recorded how erratic internet access and restricted device availability prevented Indonesian secondary school students from fully engaging in cooperative writing exercises. These infrastructural obstacles can aggravate already present educational inequities and restrict the platform's possible advantages for students most in need of more help. For teachers, the change from independent to cooperative writing assessment offers both possibilities and obstacles. (Alsubaie & Ashuraidah, 2017) discovered that conventional assessment tools often failed to detect the learning that resulted from cooperative writing operations. Students acquired negotiation skills, peer feedback competence, and revising techniques not sufficiently captured by individual writing evaluations. This result implies that teachers must create more all-encompassing assessment strategies considering both group projects and individual learning results. The requirements for professional development for effective execution cannot be ignored. Many teachers, (Laire et al., 2015) noted, lack the pedagogical expertise needed to create successful digital platform-based collaborative writing projects. Their results showed that teachers needed assistance in grasping cooperative learning theories, creating suitable tasks, and controlling online group dynamics in addition to technical training. This result emphasizes the need of thorough professional development courses tackling both the pedagogical and technical components of Google Docs deployment.   Google Docs' efficacy seems to rely rather much on task design and execution techniques. (Jeong, 2016) showed better learning results from well-planned group writing activities than from tasks just shifting traditional individual assignments to a shared digital venue. Effective collaborative writing projects often included difficult issues solved from several points of view, genuine communicative objectives, and adequate time for important revision cycles. Still under research are the long-term impacts of cooperative writing experience via Google Docs. Although short-term research regularly produces good results, doubts linger over whether students keep enthusiasm for writing following collaborative experiences end and whether cooperative writing skills transfer to individual writing scenarios. Most studies on collaborative writing, (Rifai et al., n.d.) observed, concentrate on short-term results, thus unanswered critical concerns about ongoing effects. The comment and proposal functions of the platform have been especially helpful for enabling peer feedback sessions. (Fan, 2017) observed that using Google Docs' commenting tools resulted in more thorough and insightful comments compared to conventional peer review methods. More targeted revision efforts and better learning outcomes resulted from the capacity to add comments to certain text segments, which made more focused conversations on certain writing problems possible.   Even with shown advantages, Google Docs implementation demands close consideration of equity issues. Students with little prior experience with digital collaboration tools may need extra help to actively participate in group writing projects. (Zhou et al., 2012) underlined that successful implementation must accommodate many students needs and backgrounds to guarantee that technological integration improves instead of impedes learning chances for all students. Many research contexts suggest that, if used thoughtfully and regularly, Google Docs can be a great tool for improving instruction in English writing. Through peer contact, genuine audience participation, and ongoing editing support, the platform's cooperative tools address several drawbacks of conventional writing education. But successful execution demands awareness of professional development needs, infrastructural concerns, and deliberate task design to maximize educational advantages while tackling any problems. Going forward, teachers weighing Google Docs adoption should concentrate on phased introduction, thorough training for both teachers and students, and assessment techniques that catch the whole range of learning taking place via collaborative writing activities. Although more research on long-term effects and best implementation approaches would further support effective practice, the research data offers a robust base for educated adoption decisions.

 

 IV.            Conclusion and Suggestion

4.1. Conclusion

By means of thorough examination of current educational approaches and research, I have determined that Google Docs acts as a transforming instrument that mostly changes how students’ approach and hone their writing abilities. The results show that integrating Google Docs results in noticeable advances in English writing abilities across several domains for students. Compared to conventional techniques, students engaging in collaborative writing projects via this platform demonstrate enhanced content creation, superior organizational structure, and improved language application. Addressing long-standing drawbacks of traditional individual writing assignments, the real-time cooperative tools make peer learning experiences possible that directly aid in skill development. Especially remarkable is the favourable influence on student motivation and participation. Using Google Docs, this study shows that students exhibit more interest in writing assignments, therefore turning writing from a generally terrifying solo activity into an interactive, group experience. Sustainable learning results depend on this motivational change, which also tackles psychological obstacles often prevent writing improvement. During the revision phase, the platform's feedback mechanisms prove particularly helpful. The commenting and recommendation tools allow exact, context-based input that goes beyond conventional written responses. More deeply involved in the revision process, students getting digital comments see greater significant writing quality improvement. Given that good writing ability depends on efficient revision, this result is especially important. Alongside writing abilities, Google Docs integration organically fosters 21st-century digital literacy skills. Students learn cooperative digital communication skills that go beyond the writing classroom and equip them for modern academic and professional settings. Effective performance can be much affected by technical infrastructure constraints, especially in resource-limited situations. Student opposition to sharing work-in-progress and worries about uneven involvement provide other obstacles that call for thorough educational thought. Moreover, the need of complete professional development is shown by the lack of adequate training of many teachers to create successful collaborative writing projects.

4.2. Suggestion

According on the results, I advise a strategic approach to Google Docs deployment that tackles both opportunities and problems discovered in this study. For Educators: Start with phased deployment through limited projects to get acquainted with the platform. Concentrate on creating activities that really gain from teamwork rather than just converting conventional homework into electronic versions. Develop assessment methods that capture both individual learning results and group processes. To guarantee fair involvement, offer more support for students with limited digital collaboration experience. For Educational Institutions: Invest in strong technical infrastructure including dependable internet connectivity and sufficient device access. Establish thorough professional development courses that cover both technical skills and pedagogical knowledge. In group writing scenarios, create explicit guidelines about academic honesty, privacy, and security. Use periodic evaluation procedures to gauge effectiveness and guide ongoing improvement.   For Policymakers: Prioritize digital infrastructure development to ensure equitable access across all educational settings. Update curriculum standards to explicitly incorporate collaborative writing competencies and digital literacy skills. Establish sustainable funding mechanisms for both initial technology acquisition and ongoing professional development needs. Future research directions include more study on long-term effects of cooperative writing experiences on student development. Comparative studies looking at different implementation approaches and task designs will help to pinpoint best practices. Cross-cultural studies could improve knowledge of the platform's world scope and assist culturally sensitive implementation techniques. One interesting approach to solve conventional challenges in English writing education is the integration of Google Docs in instruction. Google Docs can successfully improve both writing ability and digital literacy, therefore preparing students for collaborative communication demands of the modern world, with close attention to implementation elements including professional development, assignment design, and equity issues.

 References:

Abrams, Z. I. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs.

Afdaliah, N., & Marliana, R. (2019). THE USE OF GOOGLE DOCSTO IMPROVESTUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri (STAIN) Majene 123 (Vol. 2).

Alsubaie, J., & Ashuraidah, A. (2017). Exploring Writing Individually and Collaboratively Using Google Docs in EFL Contexts. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p10

Andrade, C., & Roshay, A. (n.d.). The CATESOL Journal • 34.1 • 2023 • 1 Using Google Docs for Collaborative Writing Feedback with International Students.

Bui, H. P. (2023). L2 Teachers’ Strategies and Students’ Engagement in Virtual Classrooms: A Multidimensional Perspective. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 617 LNNS, 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9512-5_18

Colaco, D. M., & Antao, D. (2023). Perception of pre-service teachers in using Google Docs for lesson plan writing. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 10903-10916.

Ebrahimi, S. S. (2024). Effects of mobile messaging applications on writing skill. Ampersand, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100209

Fan, M. (2017b). Google Docs as a tool for collaborative writing in the middle school classroom. In Journal of Information Technology Education: Research (Vol. 16). http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3870

Fathi, J., Saharkhiz Arabani, A., & Mohamadi, P. (2021). The effect of collaborative writing using Google docs on EFL learners’ writing performance and writing self-regulation. ‎

Hafour, M. F., & Al-Rashidy, A. S. M. (2020). Storyboarding-based collaborative narratives on Google Docs: Fostering EFL learners’ writing fluency, syntactic complexity, and overall performance. The Jalt call Journal, 16(3), 123-146.

Hoang, D. T. N., & Hoang, T. (2024). Enhancing EFL students’ academic writing skills in online learning via Google Docs-based collaboration: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1504-1526.

Jeong, K. O. (2016). A study on the integration of google docs as a web-based collaborative learning platform in EFL writing instruction. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(39). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i39/103239

Khoiriyah. (2021). Students’ perceived comfort in using Google Docs for online synchronous collaborative writing. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 18(2), 640-648.

Laire, D., Casteleyn, J., & Mottart, A. (2012). Social Media’s Learning Outcomes within Writing Instruction in the EFL Classroom: Exploring, Implementing and Analyzing Storify. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.432

Lee, K. Y., & Hassell, D. G. (2021). Students' attitudes and preferences towards Google Docs as a collaborative writing platform. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 11(2), 1-15.

Moonen, L. (2015). 'Come on guys, what are we really trying to say here?': Using Google Docs to develop Year 9 pupils' essay-writing skills. Teaching History, (161), 8.

Rifai, I., Dian Andanty, F., & Nabhan, S. (n.d.). Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris melalui Collaborative Writing dan Synchronous Corrective Feedback bagi Guru SMA/SMK di Surabaya.

Seyyedrezaıe, Z. S., Ghonsooly, B., Shahrıarı, H., & Fatemı, A. H. (2016). A Mixed Methods Analysis of The Effect of Google Docs Environment on Efl Learners’writing Performance and Causal Attributions for Success and Failure. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(3).

Screti, F. (2023). Using Google Docs for guided Academic Writing assessments: students’ perspectives. Language Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 153-174.

Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (n.d.). THE EFFECTS OF COLLABORATIVE WRITING ACTIVITY USING GOOGLE DOCS ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITIES.

Wale, B. D., & Kassahun, Y. F. (2024). The transformative power of AI writing technologies: Enhancing EFL writing instruction through the integrative use of Writerly and Google Docs. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1), 9221377.

Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google Docs in an Out-of-Class Collaborative Writing Activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359–375. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/